 Search by Keyword
 Product Categories
|
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on April 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM under
0 comments
As the only parent in my local circle of friends, parenting
discussions do not occur. And when they do, they're not much help. It's
nice to be able to talk about what's going on; concerns, etc. I
found a parenting class a while back at the local university and was
introduced to the Gordon Method. I'll be posting a few articles from
the lady who led the class. She's well-versed in these parenting
methods and unlike most, she walks the walk. So without further
a-do...
Benefits of Travelling with Children
By Judy Arnall

We brought our two children (a toddler and a baby) to England and
Ireland on our first family overseas trip in 1996. During that first
trip, we were introduced to the travelling perils of sick infants on
cars, trains, ships and aircraft, and jet-lag sleep schedule disruption,
and the wonderful task of hauling cumbersome baby travel gear around.
Since that trip, our family has grown to five children, and we have
logged another six overseas trips. Our recent holiday was to Australia
with our five children, ages 5 to 16, for six weeks. During our flight
home, listening to a mother in front of me coping with a toddler
tantrum, I reflected that it is easier in many ways to travel with older
children. They can carry their own bags and they can immerse themselves
in books or movies during long flights. But older children do have
their own challenges, such as becoming downright uncooperative when
facing situations that they don’t like, picking fights with each other
when bored, and becoming just as expensive as adults when venues charge
full fare for kids over 12.
Although it can be hard work for parents, children of all ages
benefit immensely from travelling. Travel is a multi-sensory learning
experience that is much richer than textbooks, videos or classrooms. In
addition to the obvious academic facts that they absorb from visiting
science centers, zoos, aquariums, art galleries, wildlife parks and
museums (such as the quantity flow model demonstrating Pythagorean
theorem at the Perth science center), children learn many important
life-skills while travelling, such as these:
- Perspective: They learn that home is actually not that bad,
compared to some of the rest of the world. Tripping over each other in a
500 square foot cabin helped us appreciate that we have a home to call
our own.
- Group decisions: They learn that they must either provide positive
leadership to the group, or must go along with group decisions. Not
everyone can get their way even some of the time.
- Consideration: They learn that when we are guests of others,
we must be considerate of their plans, their home and their possessions.
They learn to ask permission, that they must limit noise and clutter,
and cannot just raid the fridge. They also learn how to socialize with
hosts.
- Adaptability: Things go wrong, such as missing sleeping
bags, not enough pillows, unexpected weather, no transportation, lost
mp3 players as well as dealing with clean laundry too wet to pack.
Children learn to accept and/or make-do. Our motto when things went
wrong while travelling was “Oh well”. Sometimes it was either laugh
about it or cry about it!
- Problem solving: When adapting to new situations or circumstances,
children learn how to solve problems. They can brainstorm options and
help choose the best ones. Our 15-year-old and ten-year-old son got lost
on a hiking trip. I was astounded at their problem-solving ability to
find their way back to the camp, all the while not knowing what camp,
city or state we were staying at in Australia.
- Different rules: Rules and courtesies we take for granted in our
country are not the same in many other countries. For example, chewing
gum is illegal in Singapore.
- Patience: Travel requires so much waiting around that
children learn to be patient. They wait in long lines for check-in, for
security, and for boarding. They wait for take-off, they wait for food,
and they wait for the washroom. They wait for landing and more line-ups.
It’s endless.
- Self-entertainment: Children learn how to cope with boredom from
lack of media devices and electronic devices. When mp3 players, DVD
players and laptops are not available for playtime, they get into
sandcastle building, drawing, card games, board games, word games,
scavenger hunts and good old-fashioned conversation.
- Socializing: They learn to be polite to relatives that
they have never met before, and discover to their surprise that they
find them likeable. They learn that strangers can be friends for
travelers and it’s okay and enjoyable to strike up a conversation with
them.
- Logistics: For older children that wish to get
involved in trip planning, they learn useful skills such as how to book
itineraries, rentals, and accommodations. They can learn how to acquire
documentation such as passports, visas and consent letters. They learn
the protocol for security at airports and museums. They also learn
mapping, budgeting, and documentation (photos and journals) skills. They
learn how to secure transportation and groceries.
- Tolerance: Travelling with family members means that for
a few weeks or days, family members live in close proximity with each
other full time. That means siblings constantly in each other’s faces.
Children get very practiced at learning how to cope with different
quirks, personalities and people’s feelings. They may discover a side of
a sibling that they never noticed before and actually quite like.
With all these travel benefits, it’s no wonder that many families
take several vacations a year together. Whether staying in a tent,
trailer, cabin, cottage, hostel, hotel or visiting relatives, travel
provides an experience of a lifetime for both parents and children.
Guaranteed, it will never be boring. Have a fun and safe summer!

Judy Arnall is a professional international award-winning Parenting Speaker, and Trainer, Mom of five children, and author of the best-selling book, “Discipline
Without Distress: 135 tools for raising caring, responsible children
without time-out, spanking, punishment or bribery” and the new DVD, “Plugged-In Parenting: Connecting with the Digital Generation for Health, Safety and Love” www.professionalparenting.ca (403) 714-6766 jarnall@shaw.ca
Copyright permission granted for “reproduction without permission” of
this article in whole or part, if the above credit is included in its
entirety. Pictures added by You Get Well Soon.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on March 26, 2011 at 5:15 PM under
0 comments
I recently posted a blog about Yaz
that was more popular than I would have at first expected and it made
me think that perhaps there is more to say about birth control pills and
their effects on the body. So here we go ...
Everyone's body is different. I'm
going on record right now - we are all different. Physiologically
speaking we are unique. Similar. Shockingly similar. But definitely
individuals.
I guarantee that no one reading this has ever had a doctor or healthcare
professional do a blood workup (more than once) prior to prescribing
medication of any kind let alone birth control. I'm not going to get
into the importance of it to me - it is enough to know that millions of
women and girls (emphasis on not-yet-grown-up women) take the pill. No
one is monitoring what their baseline hormone levels are, how they
change over the course of their natural cycle and no one is matching the
prescription to these levels. Doctors are, intentionally / knowingly
or otherwise, in the pockets of big pharmaceutical companies. (I wrote a blog about it because it bugs me so much.)
For this reason sites like Drug Watch
exist to try to let people know what's going on. People should be
informed and that's why I found some good pix online to help illustrate
what a so-called normal cycle should look like and give some info about
what the pill is really doing.
This is what a menstrual cycle should look like:
where menses means menstruation. FSH
is follicle stimulating hormone (what literally stimulates a resting
would-be egg to mature enough to burst through the surface of the ovary
and float down the fallopian tube toward the uterus). LH is luteinizing hormone and when it spikes in production, menses follows.
Naturally these charts are really simplified and I've included a
more accurate one to give an idea of how variable the timing of release
is expected to be.

Now all 4 of the main hormones interact with each other in complex feedback loops. (Eating 1 oreo causes you to want more oreos - that's a kind of like a feedback loop. I know it isn't a negative one for me. I've never had 1 oreo and thought - well that's going to stop me from eating any more.)
It's crazy complex and I have no doubt that there's still lots for
the 'scientific' community to learn but just for a couple of examples:
from wiki: "LH receptors are also expressed on the maturing follicle that produces an increasing amount of estradiol", "the oestrogen rise [with follicle maturation] leads via hypothalamic interface to the positive feedback effect, a ... LH
surge that triggers ovulation, thereby not only releasing the egg but
also initiating the conversion of the residual follicle into a corpus luteum that in turn produces progesterone to prepare the endometrium for a possible implantation."
from Rocky Mountain Analytical (a hormone detection company): estradiol is needed "for the proper function of progesterone receptors and maintenance of the right balance between estrogens and progesterone" which is "crucial for hormone health."
Because sex hormones are produced by influencing hormones made in the pituitary gland (FSH, LH, thyroid stimulating hormone i.e. TSH - stimulates thyroid to produce thyroxine and triiodothyronine which in turn affect adrenal function), hypothalamus (thyrotropin-releasing hormone - controls TSH production), adrenal glands (testosterone
- which in turn affects estrogen) and ovaries. It is an enormously
complex web that the pill disrupts. This little look into the body is
enough to tell me that indiscriminately mucking with it is not going to
be without consequences.
And so it comes around again - consequences. Side effects. All prescriptives
have them. We tend to ignore them but our bodies do not have that
luxury. It is no wonder that late night television is swamped with
adverts to sue drug companies. I think that part of this trend is due
to a lack of full disclosure on the part of the doctors. Time
constraints and the pervasive thought that patients cannot handle the
volume or detailed-aspect of the information leads many doctors to gloss
over the whole story (as it is known to them, and they may not have
all of the most current published info at their fingertips). And so
big drugs are specifically targetted for law-suits. Check out these links for details regarding suits against Yaz, Celebrex and Nasonex.
I write these blogs to put info out there. If it helps someone,
that's great. An even better outcome from these posts would be to
inspire others to check out the issues they have on reputable websites
to better know what they are taking and why. A little information can
lead to foolish choices or it can bring about questions. Questions
could lead to dialogue and maybe better answers from your doctor.
Good luck!
Brought to you by You Get Well Soon.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on March 26, 2011 at 3:46 PM under
0 comments
Recently I was having lunch with my mom after one of her doctor's
appointments and like always she was consulting with me. Now just so
you know off the top - I am not a doctor. I am one of those people with
years of experience in pharmacies, health food stores, medical
research and clinical diagnostics but I am no doctor. I vacillate
between recognition of their years of intensive study and therefore
remarkable knowledge of the body and their easily bought (no, too
harsh), influenced choices when it comes to prescriptives.
Now back to my mom. She's got a whole host of problems which I
won't get into but in addition to her previous drug regimen she now
needs an additional drug for cholesterol and a different blood pressure
drug. The doctor was actually paying attention that day (I mean this
literally - she lost nearly 50 pounds which was more than 20% of her
body weight and he didn't notice before). So, he went to their stores
and brought out a bunch of samples. One of them was a new drug and he
explained that it wasn't available as a generic. And a second one was
an old drug.
This all confused my mom and maybe this is weird to you too. Drug
companies pay millions to develop new drugs. For that money, they've
got the FDA in their pockets such that there will be patent protection
for the production of the drug for anywhere from 10 to 20 years. So no
generics can be legally made and sold. After I related this to mom, I
said that that was why he had mentioned the 'new' drug and was
concerned about her being able to afford it.
With regards to the old drug - I told her that most doctors are 'encouraged' to promote new drugs so that big Pharma
can make money. Old drugs make them nothing. And if you've seen The
Fugitive you'll remember that doctors are 'courted' by drug companies.
They sponsor
conferences and meetings all over the world to not only help the dissemination
of medical information but also as self-promotion. The kind of Old
Boys' Club mentality that it would be great to eliminate but given the
state of politics (and especially special interest's groups hold on
political cojones) is unlikely to happen any time soon.
And speaking of the negatives of Big Pharma,
I was recently asked about vaccinations with respect to my own kiddos.
The old argument of vaccines causing autism came up and I had to
remind the person I was speaking to that we (in Canada) do not get the
same vaccine formulations that other countries do. Our regulations are
different and an across the board comparison is not accurate. That
stated though, another issue I have with big Pharma
is how they have vaccination drives for batches of vaccine that are
about to expire. The next time you see a push for a vaccine that should
have been delivered en masse
already (like an influenza vaccine push after January) it may be due to
someone noticing that huge numbers of units are going to be thrown out
if they don't get out the door.
This isn't to say that vaccine campaigns are always suspect. The recent ones for Mumps Measles Rubella and Varicella or Diptheria, Pertussis (acellular,
a) and Tetanus are valid and should be seriously considered by all
parents. It used to be that a child could not attend any public school
until all vaccinations were up to date. Now things are definitely
different. With the recent decline in compliance, herd immunity is down
and most all of these are making comebacks in the developed world.
I know this is diverging but I thought I'd include a few pix of what these bad-boys can do.
   
In order: Measles - identified by cough, runny nose and red eyes -
fever in excess of 39C/102F, rash and sometimes spots inside the mouth.
Complicated by diarrhea, pneumonia, encephalitis (swelling in the
brain), corneal ulceration/ scarring which would lead to vision problems
to blindness. Oh yeah and a fever of 40C can mess up the brain
forever.
Mumps - noticeable and painful swelling of the parotid
(salivary glands) and testes (also painful for adolescents or adult
males that can in rare cases lead to infertility), fever and headache.
Both have recently been enormous problems in the western world with outbreaks dominating diagnostics in many countries.
Rubella - a personal favorite of mine because a schoolmate had
it 6 times in 2 years. (And to this day she's mad at me for giving her
scarlet fever. sheesh.) Also has a
rash, swollen glands, joint pain, headache and conjunctivitis. Mostly
a danger to pregnant women as it causes spontaneous abortion and
congenital rubella syndrome (heart, brain, eye and ear defects which
are permanent, low birth weight, prematurity, anaemia, hepatitis, "blueberry muffin skin lesions" and low platelet levels or thrombocytopenia which causes wound healing problems.)
Varicella
- perhaps better known as herpes / chicken pox / shingles. The pic
above is shingles because just about everyone knows what Chicken Pox
looks like. They're vaccinating for this because of the increased risk
for serious Staph and Strep infections of the lesions.
To note in the shingles pic - the rash is only on half of the body.
Usually front and back and there can be limb involvement. This rash is
painful in 80-odd% of cases. Really Painful.
Diptheria is one I won't forget
seeing as my mom had it as a small child. It causes sore throat
(inflamed neck = bull neck), usually low but in rarer cases high fever,
adherent pseudomembrane which may
require medical intervention to maintain breathing and can lead to
heart problems and death. (My mom was sent home to die 3 times.)
Pertussis, also known as Whooping Cough. This one is quite
common in the north of Canada and causes a type of cough that is so
persistent that the person doesn't get much time to breathe - hence the
whoop. Technically called a paroxysmal cough. It is so severe that it
can cause eye hemorrhages, rib fractures, incontinence, hernia,
fainting, inspiration of vomitting and even vertebral artery dissection. If that didn't spell it out - hey, it's serious!
Tetanus. This one got some press recently when Selma Hayek
teemed up with Pampers to distribute vaccines to the third world. This
bacteria is of the same parent group that includes botulism (yes, botox),
gangrene and an overwhelming intestinal infection known as C.diff.
Tetanus causes the muscles of the body to contract (opposite of
botulism). It's painful - very painful. Think of a muscle spasm that
you may have had in your leg or back and multiply it by all the
voluntary muscles of the body. In the industrialized world the fatality
rate is about 11% but elsewhere it's more like 50-75%. High fevers,
sweating, increased heart rate and blood pressure go with it - but
that's no surprise given the muscle contractions. Lockjaw is also a
common first sign.
So vaccines in general good.
Big Pharma not always good. I think
of them like any big business of today (or say the Catholic Church of
the dark ages) with so much power - it's easy to be corrupted. And if a
church can justify killing thousands if not millions what can a
corporation justify doing?
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on March 6, 2011 at 5:10 PM under
0 comments
If you grew up in the 80s, you know
exactly who Phil Collins is and what an incredible influence and impact
he has had on music. I remember well doing a thorough washing of an apartment to
To
this day I can probably sing every word (not well mind you) and recall
every nuance of these songs. But if his retirement reminds me of
anything, it is that I too am aging. And perhaps I can learn a few
things from this rocker. One of the
reasons he sites for retirement is that he has problems with his back
and nerve damage in his hands from years of hunching over a drum set. I
myself have never played drums and have no concept of the ergonomics
of the instrument.

I
do wonder if perhaps a redesign of the seating or set up would help
out in this department. I cannot imagine having to stop doing
something I love because doing it has become the cause of health
problems. It also brought up for me something that was harped on
when I was growing up - Posture. My family was rather anal-retentive
on this issue and because of it I still have quite good posture and
even make a point of sitting properly when at the laptop. I do this
not just because I was constantly reminded to do so but more out of a
deeply held knowledge that my body prefers it. Just try it and you'll
notice the difference. Your breath can come more easily and deeply.
Your back won't hurt when you stand up and you'll find yourself far
less fatigued. Unfortunately, like any other form of attention - it
takes effort and practice. (Like thinking good thoughts - it doesn't
come naturally at first - it takes practice.) I don't expect that
Mr. Collins will ever read this but if I could I'd ask him if he's
every really tried out yoga or, even easier on the body, QiGong. Or
perhaps even some simple breath/ stretching exercises like Dr. Fulford's.
I'm sure everyone recognizes the pose below:

Unlike
most classic yoga poses that seem to be more focused on stretching/
bending (seem, being the operative word) this one is more about
attention to your own body's internal position. Focusing on your body -
in a good way. A way that helps your body to work better, feel
better.
Another less well-known method for achieving internal balance and awareness is QiGong. I was introduced to this practice by my massage therapist.
I had been going while pregnant and found that the practice of QiGong
could be minimally physical while still producing wonderful,
energizing and relaxing (I know weird combo) sensations. It can
resemble Tai Chi and also is great at focusing the mind and body.
Either
way, I do hope that Mr. Collins is able to find some physical relief
for his chronic symptoms and is able to fully enjoy his retirement and kiddos.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on February 28, 2011 at 10:35 PM under
0 comments
I'm not sure if that should read mistake or mistakes - either way, please don't do what I did.
My little one is 4 years old. She's got teeth that are seriously
close together. Not overlapping but very nearly fused together. For
this reason, I had only ever flossed her teeth if there was something
(miraculously) between them. (Wrong #in no particular order really -
let's say 3) I brush her teeth twice a day, after breakfast and
before bed. It is very rare for me to miss one of these but I cannot
say that's never happened. (Wrong #4). I only used a child's toothpaste
or one that had no fluoride (Wrong #7).
She also drinks watered down juice most days of her life for most of
the last 2 years. And she eats some candy. If anyone other than me is
in charge - a lot of candy. (Wrong #5&6) She rarely if ever
drinks milk (Wrong #8 and Right). I took her to the pediatric
dentist for the first time on Thursday. (Wrong #2 - not taking her
earlier). The first thing they did was take X-rays. Not unexpected.
Even the Dora book writes this as the first thing the dental assistant
will do. Thank you Dora.
They've got a new-fangled panoramic
X-ray machine that was a little scary for her because she has to hold
onto this huge machine that is all around her and moves around her but
no big whoop. Then they started with the more conventional ones. This
was also a bit scary but she got through it. Now once the dentist got
there to look at the X-rays I really expected him (in this case, him) to
say something like "Yup, she's got teeth. See you in a year." That's
not what happened. At All.
Turned out she has more cavities than teeth. Over 30 for her little
mouth of 20 teeth. So many that the dentist described that it would
take 4 or 5 sessions in the chair with some kind of mild sedation,
drilling (complete with the smell of burning teeth), needles, etc. i.e.
TRAUMA
Then he went into a description of a surgery to do the same thing all at
once. The cost difference - in the chair about $4000 - with some form
of sedation. About $3000 without. (Yeah, like I'm going to cheap out on
pain meds.)
As a surgery - - you guessed it, $5000. She's 4. With 20 teeth. That
means for the 2 or 3 remaining years they will be in her mouth, they
will have cost about $300 each. Now unless the toothfairy is real and
pays hard currency - even with inflation, she's not paying out 3 bills.
So why do people pay for this fix? The rot can infect the soft
tissues, bones of the jaw, get into the blood and cause septicemia and
of course could rot the adult teeth before they even break the surface.
Cavities before the teeth come in - not a great options.
So by this time you may be asking yourself - with all of the listed
wrongs - what is Wrong #1? Ah, if only I had remembered my mother's
off-handed comment to me sooner. When I was a teenager, my mom made a
comment to me that for some reason I remembered. She said that she
loved my breath as a little kid. Now my mom is European and says lots
of weird things out of the blue. Why I should remember this one - I
don't know. But what I didn't realize was what it really implied.
I asked what she meant by sweet - she said not like candy (which would
be a bad thing - like diabetes) but different. Now, I remember my
little one's breath before it changed. It smelled like crisp apples.
 
I know this is true because there's another littler one in my life and her breath is like that still.
The moment it switched - and so young ~2 years old - from
sweet/crisp/fresh to kind of foul I should have taken her to the
dentist. I thought the switch happened because I had caught her using
my toothbrush. I figured she had gotten my germs (and this could be
true) from my brush and that's what had changed her breath (and
naturally the flora in her mouth). Maybe I did contribute to her cavity
problem. That and her having teeth too close together, her drinking
juice (although I don't know that I believe this because I drank and ate
everything I could get my hands on and I didn't have these problems),
brushing with non-fluoride toothpaste, not going to the dentist earlier,
candy, missing brushings and not taking seriously a major shift in her
breath.
Does this make me a bad parent - maybe. We are coughing up the $5000 to
have the surgery - under general anesthetic. (And in this climate of
financial hardship - this is one error we will never forget.) Now I can
only hope that all will go well and that no other major problems with
these unnaturally expensive teeth will occur.
Oh, and yes, I checked online about costs - and these are on par with
expected pediatric dental rates for what is being done (stainless steel
caps, ceramic caps, filing of the teeth to increase spacing, etc.,
etc.).
So if this can save someone else's teeth and pocketbook - I'll be happy
for it. No family should have to undergo this bizarre series of events
just for baby teeth.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on October 5, 2010 at 1:22 AM under
0 comments
This may sound weird but after my mom's trouble with ulcers you'd think
that it would be natural to check my dad for the bacteria that causes
90% of all ulcers: Helicobacter pylori. I wrote a blog
about this a few months ago and included info about how this little
factoid was discovered - and how it resulted in a Nobel Prize for Dr.
Warren.
My dad reminds me in some ways of Dr. David Suzuki. I don't mean in the seriously eco-sensitive,
hosts his own TV show, has a foundation to help protect the earth way.
You may not have seen the interview with him that disclosed his
commitment to his physique but it left a lasting impression on me.
OK,
so in that interview he told a story about how one of his daughters had
a bodybuilding magazine out that she was looking at and he offhandedly
mentioned that he could look like that. According to his interview, she
scoffed as only a teenager could which prompted him to take up
bodybuilding. He did end up looking like the guy on the cover of the
magazine (see above - wow) but more to the point of my father, they
showed some footage of Suzuki building a deck. He was hammering nails
into the boards with the speed and accuracy of a nail gun. No fooling.
And he was in his 60s at the time. Yikes and Hey - How You Doin'? My
dad believes in exercise as no one else I've ever known. He devises
little machines and routines regularly to improve his physique. The man
exercises for a living via his career in home improvements and then
comes home to walk the dogs for and hour. Every day. And then proceeds
to do his made-up exercises. So when he was having gastrointestinal
problems that would not be cleared my mom began to worry. I was asked
for some insights and gave the usual answers - watery diarrhea use
activated charcoal. But if it's an infection it should clear on its own
in 7 to 10 days. This didn't happen. He wasn't dehydrated. He
didn't have cramping or pains. Just this knowledge that the volume
going in wasn't reflected by the volume going out. So my next
suggestion was a laxative. This did help with the volume going out.
This is good but still this water problem. Adding to my mom's
concern was that he wasn't active. He was watching TV. Not that he
never watches but he sat for more than an hour. This doesn't happen.
Ever. He was fatigued. And it wasn't ending. Combine that with the need
to use the facilities immediately after eating and that's a combo no
one wants. Now when my mom was diagnosed with an ulcer back in
2006, I told my mom to get dad checked. They are from a part of the
world (middle Europe pre-1960) where the incidence of Helicobacter pylori infectivity is super high. Did he go? Course not. But
something about these symptoms really bugged me - so I put the bee in
mom's ear and she called his doctor's office and forced them to run the
test. And finally the results are in - yup, he's got it. So why am I
relieved? There is a cure. Even though antibiotics do not work a lot of
the time (like a 70% failure rate). There are natural things that can help out with clearing the bug.
Now I don't know if my dad will be 100% after his treatment regime but
if he can get back his energy and not need a washroom every time he
thinks about eating - I'll be happy.
Bottom line - you need a patient advocate. Seriously, what kind of
doctor doesn't think to check the spouse of a known ulcer patient who
has tested positive for H. pylori.
This isn't rocket surgery. It's passed through saliva and hello
married people are known to kiss, share food and drinks. Not to
mention the above stated likelihood of his having the bacteria due to
location and conditions of his life prior to living in Canada. The
patient shouldn't need to diagnose themselves. A reminder of your
individual situation no matter how difficult it may be to get your
healthcare practitioner to listen, may just lead to the diagnosis you
need so that you too can be on the road to recovery; like my dad.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on August 12, 2010 at 11:13 PM under
1 comment
I've begun checking expiry dates very carefully on snack foods for
business reasons - no one wants to purchase a gift bag with expired
treats. This led me to an interesting and disturbing find. . . Have you
noticed that snacking foods (crackers, cookies, etc.) all have
ridiculously short expiry dates?
I bought 4 boxes of the 100
calorie Oreo wafers. I like them and there was a double coupon offer
so, hey, yeah 4 boxes. It wasn't until I was prepping for a home show
for You Get Well Soon that I noticed that of these boxes that I had bought ONLY 2 months ago 3 had
already expired. So I thought I'd check out all the snacks I could find
in Costco that would otherwise be appropriate for the business. Lo and
behold, not 1 and I mean that literally, not 1 had a date later than
November. Most had September. September? It's August!
I
was in the health food store and heard the clerk speaking with a
customer about how if everyone in the world ate the way we did (in
North America) the Earth would run out of food in just a few years. But
the more I thought about it the more I was angered. It's not the way we
eat it's got much more to do with the fact that we don't grow food for
consumption we grow food for profit. Every grocer has to have
'enticing'displays so that we'll buy their food. How much waste is
involved in that process? And when we don't buy - it all goes to waste.
What about the food we do buy? Do we eat all of it or isthere waste in
that process too? This doesn't even include restaurants - even more
waste. We are training ourselves, our children and the rest of the
world to waste food at a rate many times (orders of magnitude) higher
than that at which we consume.
And so I am brought back to
the expiry dates. It would seem as though the producers of the snack
foods mentioned in the first paragraph are not experiencing enough
waste - because clearly waste = profits. It must, right? If the food
expires before the store can sell it - it's tossed (at a loss) and then
the store will have to order more. And so the cycle continues. It's a
SCAM and it's time we as consumers started talking to not only our
local stores, news and everyone we know. It's time we took the argument
to the producers - not only by not buying their products (because we're
talking about pretty much all snack food producers) but directly
talking to them. Letting them know that we're on to them and we want
honesty - not scams.
If food
packaging was really that poor - for snack foods in particular - than
none of us would be alive today to be scammed. Expiry dates on snack
foods is a pretty new phenomenon. So we who are older than 10 years old
have eaten food from the pantry (that had been there for more than 2
months - I can almost guarantee it) all of our lives. I have had such
food and I know it was more than a year old. And guess what - tasted
great. It is highly unlikely that the packaging available has gotten
less effective over the last 30 or 40 years. So what is the difference?
The manufacturers have realized a new way to increase their profits -
WASTE.
Nothing makes me more crazy that waste - especially
when it's for no reason. If it makes you crazy too - I Want to hear
about it. We can stop this - but first we have to be aware. Then let
those in the biz know that not only are we on to them - but we won't
stand for it!
Help me out on this one and we'll all benefit!
Reposted from yougetwellsoon.wordpress.com
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on July 3, 2010 at 1:30 AM under
0 comments
Nearly ever since the advent of Viagra, there has been a search for
a female counterpart. (For a recap on how Viagra saw the light of day -
check out The Viagra Story.)
Don't get me wrong, many women find Viagra works well to improve their
sex life. The drug companies need a new compound to market to women.
Since Viagra is so well-known as a treatment for men, there needs to be
a separate drug for women. This is just marketing. So which behemoth
drug company has come closest to the finish line - Boehringer Ingelheim
with their new Little Pink Pill Flibanserin (and I do hope they come up
with a more catchy name). Not surprisingly, this drug is not trying to
physically 'up' women's sexual responsiveness. Instead it is geared
toward the psychological aspects of sexuality.
Boehringer
Ingerheim doesn't even claim to have any expertise or interest in this
area of research. Here's a pic from their website:

Nowhere
on this list is anything to do with emotional issues. The only area
that comes close to brain function alteration for the purpose of
emotional enhancement is Parkinson's - and it's not close enough for my
blood.
Here comes the question - does the medical community
know enough about how the brain works to play around with it? And for
sex? Really. How many reports have their been that antidepressants led
to suicides? Or how about the rampant use of Ritalin.
If your kiddo is not paying attention to you or to school - give them a
pill. Ritalin is a central nervous system stimulant similar to
amphetamines targeting the dopamine neurotransmitter in a manner
similar to cocaine. The side effects are numerous: Short-term effects
can include nervousness and insomnia, loss of appetite, nausea and
vomiting, dizziness, palpitations, headaches, changes in heart rate and
blood pressure (usually elevation of both, but occasionally
depression), skin rashes and itching, abdominal pain, weight loss, and
digestive problems, toxic psychosis, psychotic episodes, drug
dependence syndrome, and severe depression upon withdrawal. (Taken from
a webpage of Partnership for a Drug-Free America.) How are these Side
Effects better than a kid who has trouble focusing? Let's face it -
kids don't pay close attention. They just don't. And what's more - with
time, they get over it. But somehow we've bought into the idea that
it's not only OK but necessary to mess with the developing brains of
our children. How do we know that we won't be permanently altering the
course of their natural development? And here's the rub - is there any
way for us to know this with certainty?
And so I question, do we
really know enough about the brain and it's changes with not only
puberty and early development (as is the question with Ritalin) but
with the hormonal cycling of female brains (and yes the hormonal
cycling triggers do also come from the brain) and menopause /
peri-menopause? It seems as though we haven't figured out how best to
handle the hormonal changes of menopause - and now we're going to
further complicate matters by mucking with women's brains on top of
things.
In a time when a large proportion of the population and
even the medical profession is rediscovering the efficacy of natural
approaches why are we being bombarded by these 'medical interventions'?
Pharmaceuticals are big business. They're so big they can force
compliance of governing bodies like the FDA and they can also lure
physicians into prescribing drugs when they could be exploring the
nature of the problem. If you think I'm off my rocker - do you know
someone who is taking 1 or more drugs to counteract the side effects of
another drug their taking? Or perhaps you remember the Vioxx scandal - the NSAID that caused heart attacks?
So
yes there will be a Little Pink Pill - backed heavily by
Boehringer-Ingerheim with the help of their paid researchers and
marketing team - don't believe it - check out Sex, Brain, Body.
They even produced a special panel with 6 of 8 specialists supported
directly by them. And in the field of research it may as well read -
owned by Boehringer. But like big oil - it's up to the consumer to make
as many alternate choices as possible and put pressure on our elected
officials to ensure that our Best Interests are being addressed - not
big business's.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on June 15, 2010 at 1:55 AM under
0 comments
I was reading the Yahoo! news again - clearly I'm addicted, and caught an article on 20 things not to buy used.
It brought to mind a few horror stories but one that seems pertinent to
the topic - skin infections. On the list are things you'd expect like
laptops, plasma / LCD TVs, mattresses but also undergarments and
footwear. And that's when my memory clued in. (Well it clued in with
the laptops one because I have a used laptop and I can honestly say
I'll never do that again - ever, ever, ever!)
My grandmother worked in a garment factory in Winnipeg forever. I
remember going to the strangest shops when I lived there because she
knew all the places to buy direct. Naturally when I was little I found
this terribly embarrassing. Now, not unexpectedly, I miss it. And her
- but that's a different blog. Point being, these are not the cleanest
of places. There are all manner of rodents and bugs. Even if you
could get past this - think of where the fabrics were made. You've got
all those rodents, reptiles and bugs to think of and those that were
on the transport vehicles to get them to the factories and stores and
ultimately to you. Yikes!
I remember when I was younger and got new clothes that I wanted to
wear them right away. You try them on in the store, why not wear them
a bit longer. Well I think a few illustrative stories will never let
you forget the why. Story 1. I was working in a lab with some summer
students and didn't know this one girl very well. I had noticed
something on her upper back/ shoulder but since clothes covered it up
most of the time didn't say anything. (A rarity for me I assure you.)
That was until she wore this really nice sarong as a dress and the
area was very noticable. So the first thing I did was ask if she was
aware of an unusual patch of skin on her back. Oh yeah, she replied
I've had it for a while. Next question: Do you wash your clothes
before you wear them the first time? No. Ah, please start doing
that. And I went into the explanation of bugs etc. that started off
this blog. I also told her Story 2. Having been a starving student
for many years, I shop for bargains and I was shopping in Winners one
day trying on tanks. Well, I remember the incident specifically
because it was a really tight-fitting tank (for sport) and I had
removed my bra to try it on. This led to a year-long battle with what
I finally learned was ringworm. You'll know ringworm when you see it
because it literally is a pinkish, circular ring around your normal
skin tone and it's about 4-8 mm in diameter. Ringworm
is a parasitic fungal infection caused by several different species of
fungus that feed on keratin in the outer layer of skin, hair, and
nails. And here was the key for my 'catching' it - the fungus thrives
on warm, moist skin - like the skin under the breasts. Apparently it
survives directly on cloth for a time because I sure got it.
The follow-up to this ringworm tale of woe is that none of the
topical steroidal creams normally used to treat it worked. Neither did
tea tree oil (which is supposed to kill fungus) or really any
'treatment' cream. So I did what I do and tried to reason out how to
get rid of this. It could be like other fungal infections and run its
course and since it didn't really bother me particularly this was an
option. But I did remember from that medical micro course that I had
to take that fungi have the same metabolic pathways as human cells
which means that most anything used to kill it will kill our cells.
Kind of a problem.
I was in the shower one day and was looking at the bottle of
dandruff shampoo that my boyfriend had - Nizoral. I figured, I've
lived with this for so long why not try the antifungal shampoo - and
wouldn't you know it - within a couple of tries, the ringworm was
gone. Totally gone - after over a year of it. Needless to say, this
is what I recommended to the summer student and ever since I always
have a bottle of Nizoral in the medicine cabinet - ok, whole closet of
remedies, potions, etc.
The take home lesson - yup there are lots of things to not buy used.
Apparently there's also a reason to carry wash wipes with you into
change rooms. Oh yes and wash clothes before you wear them. (I never
could be brief and to the point - guess that career as Twitter-master
is right out the window.) Trust me it's easier and far kinder to your
skin.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on May 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM under
0 comments
No not me,
my mom has had a perforated duodenal ulcer. She had numerous terribly
‘inconvenient’ symptoms for many years – probably her whole life to a
greater or lesser extent. Not to get too graphic but they included
pain in the abdomen that increased after eating, inability to properly
digest food, urgency for evacuation of the bowels after eating,
malaise, fatigue, heartburn and irritability (go figure).
After work one day 9 months after my own stay in hospital, I found
myself heading over to the Rockyview Hospital Emergency Room to meet up
with my dad and mom. My dad’s a serious diabetic and needed to go home
for dinner so I sent him home and stayed with my mom in the ER until
she could be seen and as it turned out be admitted.
By 11:30pm, I had had quite enough of sitting on wooden and plastic
chairs and felt that she was going to be cared for so I left. What I
missed was an ugly aspect of determining if an ulcer is present and in
need of surgery – they put a hose up her nose and into the stomach to
drain the contents continually. Yikes! And she has a real thing about
her nose too. Always very concerned that things are perfectly
presentable if you know what I mean. So this was a nightmarish
beginning for her 11-day stay in the hospital.
Turned out she had a perforated ulcer in the first portion of the
small intestine just past the stomach. The cause of ulcers in up to
90% of cases is a bacterium called Helicobacter pylori. This
concept (a bacterial cause) went against the grain of everyone’s
understanding of ulcers. So much so that the people who finally
convinced the scientific and medical community that H. pylori
was the cause of ulcers were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2005. How did
Dr. Warren finally convince everyone – through normal scientific
studies? Nope! After years of study still no one believed him – so he
drank a culture of H.pylori in public, developed an ulcer then cured it with antibiotics.
Why the extreme measures? No one believed that bacteria could live
in the stomach – it’s like battery acid in there. But bacteria had
been found by scientists – in 1875, in 1893 and an entire treatise to
the subject was written in 1899 connecting stomach aliments to curved
rod bacteria. Unfortunately for the world of science and medicine, it
was written in Polish. Now we know more about these clever little
buggers; they take urea which is made and found in the stomach and
convert it to 2 useful (for them) end products – bicarbonate (to
neutralize stomach acid) and ammonia (also neutralizing and directly
damaging to stomach cells). These guys can also burrow into cells of
the stomach (or in my mom’s case intestinal wall) using their curved
shape and propelling flagella. They smartly do not attack cells that
produce acid – there are specialized stomach cells that do this. They
inject a protein into the stomach lining cells that disables the cells’
ability to stay attached to their neighbours (leaving gaps for stomach
contents to leak out) which in turn causes an increase in the
inflammatory response. The inflammatory response causes the stomach to
not only make more acid but make more cells that make more acid. It’s
like an exponential increase in acid production leading to more and
more damage to the already damaged areas of the stomach (or intestine)
where they have set up shop (i.e. colonized). And we think we’re
survivors.
Unfortunately for my mom, it looks as though she will have to go
through some version of the whole ugly process again – perhaps with
surgery this time. The big risks include not just the surgery
complications but also when an area of the body has experienced that
much inflammation for that long there is a much greater risk of
cancer. And how did this all begin – with a bacteria she probably
picked up in her youth in Eastern Europe. It’s not a coincidence that
the early scientists that found these stomach bacteria were from
Germany and Poland – they’re more commonly found there in nature. Why
don’t they just kill the bacteria off before reaching the water
supply? No one wants those kinds of concentrations of antibiotics in
the water and in short order it wouldn’t be effective against the
bacteria anyway. And filtering bacteria would be prohibitively
expensive – a less than .45micron (0.000018 in) filter would be
needed. That would be the cleanest water ever in the world – well
practically.
What’s the answer? I’m sure I don’t know – all I do know is that I want my mom to be OK.
If you’ve got more info on duodenal ulcers in particular – I’d love
to hear it so that I can be a better resource for my understandably
concerned family.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on May 28, 2010 at 6:00 PM under
0 comments
It seems
this particular physical condition has been a plague to Hollywood.
Recent cases that have led to the deaths of Gary Coleman, Natasha
Richardson and John Ritter and has caused countless scary problems for
Celebrity Apprentice winner Bret Michaels. So what is intracranial
hemorrhage and why does it have such a high fatality rate?
Medicine is filled with Greek and Latin words and this little phrase
is no exception. The prefix intra is Latin for within and cranial
refers to of or relating to the skull. A hemorrhage of any kind is a
leak of blood into surrounding tissues. So an intracranial hemorrhage
is a blood leak somewhere in the skull. It can occur due to an
externally initiated trauma like crashing into a tree while skiing or
it can be internally initiated by a ruptured aneurysm. Aneurysms are
blood vessels that have a structural defect like a bulge. This bulge
over time weakens the vessel such that it actually bursts.
To help out with the gaps in my own memories of anatomy and perhaps
yours too, I did a bit of a refresher on how blood moves through the
body. The lungs exchange carbon dioxide for oxygen using hemoglobin as
a means of carrying the oxygen through the blood. Since the heart
wants to move only the oxygenated blood to the whole of the body, it
sends blood first to the lungs via the right ventricle. Once the
oxygenated blood is returned to the heart through the left atrium, it
is sent to the left ventricle to be pumped to the whole of the rest of
the body via the aorta. This begins the longest pressurized route the
blood will take and because of this the aorta is the largest of the
arterial structures. It has to be large to withstand the pressure of
that large volume of blood being sent all through the body.
Once the blood has reached all of the tissues, via arteries that
split off to reach all the body parts and become smaller arteries
(arterioles) and then capillaries (the smallest vessels in the blood
system that accesses all tissues of the body) that exchange fresh
oxygenated blood for spent blood found in the tissues (blood with less
oxygen and various tissue / cellular waste products) the blood then
travels to the venous system. The veins closest to the capillaries are
very small then grade up to larger vessels as they join up with veins
from other areas of the body on the return trip to the heart. They
have very little in the way of structural support and rely instead on a
combination of the surrounding muscle and the flow of blood initiated
by the left ventricle to move the deoxygenated blood back to the right
atrium of the heart to start the cycle of blood flow over again. This
is the reason that most aneurysms occur in arteries – they experience
more pressure.
What makes these intracranial hemorrhages so deadly? The extra blood
(no longer contained in the vessels and pouring out into the brain
cavity) increases the pressure in the skull (because it is a fixed
size) which then can crush brain structures and disrupt normal brain
blood flow. The brain is so important to the body that regardless of
what is happening in the body it takes the glucose and oxygen first.
Part of the problem with brain injury is that there are structures and
glands in the brain that control essential body functions like breath
rate, heart rate, sleep, awareness, sex hormones, stress hormones,
pretty much everything that keeps life going in a direct or indirect
way. So that’s the how but what is the why with respect to the
seemingly high numbers of intracranial hemorrhages lately? I know I
don’t have an answer. I do know that most people do not eat as well as
they think they do. That many people do not have enough trace minerals
in their diet and that minerals like copper are needed to make certain
essential metabolic enzymes work. Is this enough of a why – I don’t
know. I do know that I’ll be keeping my eyes and ears open for a more
complete answer.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on May 26, 2010 at 6:00 PM under
0 comments
I think
this will become a multipart, repeating theme for this blog. I was
going to start this blog site off with quite a different post,
introducing myself and what my ideas and goals are for content but it’s
happened again; the news is telling only part of a story. This drives
me crazy. They give you a detail and repeat the same stuff over and
over without telling important and easy to access information. The
topic: Salmonella in bagged salad – recall.
To get sick with Salmonella requires huge numbers of bacteria.
Millions to billions of bacteria in a single dose are required to cause
infection. This is roughly the number needed to see if you were to
grow them in culture – if you’ve not worked in a lab – this would be
about the number of bacteria that grow in the bottom of a tea pot after
days of growth. When the clear, translucent tea becomes cloudy
especially at the bottom – this is usually bacterial growth (and
probably some bits of tea leaves that escaped the bag).
Salmonellosis in pregnant women can lead to intrauterine death
(still birth or spontaneous abortion / miscarriage), premature delivery
and neonatal infection. Pregnant women are particularly susceptible
due to a lowered immune function. I personally did not find this – in
fact I was hyperimmune. Nothing could get me sick when pregnant so I
don’t know if this poor immunity in pregnancy as universal as we are
told to believe. I also remember in my studies learning about how
hearing loss could be attributed to infection in utero but I cannot
find a source for this info now that I’m actually looking for it.
(There are good sources for high fever in pregnancy leading to hearing
loss of the resulting children. And the Salmonella that causes typhoid
can certainly do this. Intestinal infections usually don’t have high
enough fevers for long enough (less than 3 days) to cause these types
of problems for the children. But nothing’s set in stone.)
Infection in the very young is also extremely dangerous. Breastmilk
and formula have special buffering agents so that the stomach acid is
reduced in its efficacy. The normally hostile environment of the
stomach can kill just about anything but if the quantity is high enough
or the movement through the stomach is too fast or something protects
bacteria from the stomach acid then some bacteria will get through.
(Is this reminding anyone of the Activia ads? Yes, yogurt is loaded up
with millions of bacteria but they have to be 1. alive and 2. in a
medium that will protect the bacteria so that they can survive to reach
the intestines alive – like milk.)
The elderly and those who are immune compromised are also at risk of
serious infection. Unfortunately for the individual but lucky for
finding the source, symptoms begin 8 to 48 hours after ingestion and
are severe. They include intestinal cramping, mucous laden-diarrhea /
dysentery – or bloody diarrhea, nausea, vomitting, fever and chills.
It does usually run its course without the need of interventions but
it’s so nasty that you’ll likely be feeling like death not-quite-warmed
over.
WASH your fruits and veg. Even ones that say they are washed are
not to be trusted. (There are some intestinal bacteria that need only
1 cell present to result in sickness.) Salad is especially tough to
wash with soap but I usually manage with my salad spinner (for rinsing)
and foaming soap (I use dishsoap with a foamer-pump). And please Never
eat salad if you’ve had a stomach bug in the recent past – you’re just
asking for more trouble.
|
 Shopping Basket
Note: All prices in Canadian Dollars
 Specials
Office Gift PackThis handy little gift pack is perfect for the colleague who's down and out.
Office get well soon gift bag contains a mug, snacks, cream and tissues. You never know when you need to give a gift to a colleague and this one is handy and suits men and women.
Perfect hospital gift for a man.
|
|