 Search by Keyword
 Product Categories
|
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on February 28, 2011 at 10:35 PM under
0 comments
I'm not sure if that should read mistake or mistakes - either way, please don't do what I did.
My little one is 4 years old. She's got teeth that are seriously
close together. Not overlapping but very nearly fused together. For
this reason, I had only ever flossed her teeth if there was something
(miraculously) between them. (Wrong #in no particular order really -
let's say 3) I brush her teeth twice a day, after breakfast and
before bed. It is very rare for me to miss one of these but I cannot
say that's never happened. (Wrong #4). I only used a child's toothpaste
or one that had no fluoride (Wrong #7).
She also drinks watered down juice most days of her life for most of
the last 2 years. And she eats some candy. If anyone other than me is
in charge - a lot of candy. (Wrong #5&6) She rarely if ever
drinks milk (Wrong #8 and Right). I took her to the pediatric
dentist for the first time on Thursday. (Wrong #2 - not taking her
earlier). The first thing they did was take X-rays. Not unexpected.
Even the Dora book writes this as the first thing the dental assistant
will do. Thank you Dora.
They've got a new-fangled panoramic
X-ray machine that was a little scary for her because she has to hold
onto this huge machine that is all around her and moves around her but
no big whoop. Then they started with the more conventional ones. This
was also a bit scary but she got through it. Now once the dentist got
there to look at the X-rays I really expected him (in this case, him) to
say something like "Yup, she's got teeth. See you in a year." That's
not what happened. At All.
Turned out she has more cavities than teeth. Over 30 for her little
mouth of 20 teeth. So many that the dentist described that it would
take 4 or 5 sessions in the chair with some kind of mild sedation,
drilling (complete with the smell of burning teeth), needles, etc. i.e.
TRAUMA
Then he went into a description of a surgery to do the same thing all at
once. The cost difference - in the chair about $4000 - with some form
of sedation. About $3000 without. (Yeah, like I'm going to cheap out on
pain meds.)
As a surgery - - you guessed it, $5000. She's 4. With 20 teeth. That
means for the 2 or 3 remaining years they will be in her mouth, they
will have cost about $300 each. Now unless the toothfairy is real and
pays hard currency - even with inflation, she's not paying out 3 bills.
So why do people pay for this fix? The rot can infect the soft
tissues, bones of the jaw, get into the blood and cause septicemia and
of course could rot the adult teeth before they even break the surface.
Cavities before the teeth come in - not a great options.
So by this time you may be asking yourself - with all of the listed
wrongs - what is Wrong #1? Ah, if only I had remembered my mother's
off-handed comment to me sooner. When I was a teenager, my mom made a
comment to me that for some reason I remembered. She said that she
loved my breath as a little kid. Now my mom is European and says lots
of weird things out of the blue. Why I should remember this one - I
don't know. But what I didn't realize was what it really implied.
I asked what she meant by sweet - she said not like candy (which would
be a bad thing - like diabetes) but different. Now, I remember my
little one's breath before it changed. It smelled like crisp apples.
 
I know this is true because there's another littler one in my life and her breath is like that still.
The moment it switched - and so young ~2 years old - from
sweet/crisp/fresh to kind of foul I should have taken her to the
dentist. I thought the switch happened because I had caught her using
my toothbrush. I figured she had gotten my germs (and this could be
true) from my brush and that's what had changed her breath (and
naturally the flora in her mouth). Maybe I did contribute to her cavity
problem. That and her having teeth too close together, her drinking
juice (although I don't know that I believe this because I drank and ate
everything I could get my hands on and I didn't have these problems),
brushing with non-fluoride toothpaste, not going to the dentist earlier,
candy, missing brushings and not taking seriously a major shift in her
breath.
Does this make me a bad parent - maybe. We are coughing up the $5000 to
have the surgery - under general anesthetic. (And in this climate of
financial hardship - this is one error we will never forget.) Now I can
only hope that all will go well and that no other major problems with
these unnaturally expensive teeth will occur.
Oh, and yes, I checked online about costs - and these are on par with
expected pediatric dental rates for what is being done (stainless steel
caps, ceramic caps, filing of the teeth to increase spacing, etc.,
etc.).
So if this can save someone else's teeth and pocketbook - I'll be happy
for it. No family should have to undergo this bizarre series of events
just for baby teeth.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on January 30, 2011 at 12:30 AM under
0 comments
This will be another weird one but here goes . . .
As you may have read, I use cloth diapers for my babies. And as I'm
sure you can imagine they're not that easy to get / keep clean. I've
used just about everything available on the market and have pretty much
given up on my unlined diapers. But when I wasn't getting proper
results even with the lined ones, I all but despaired. OK. Despair is a
wee bit strong.
Nevertheless, they were no longer getting clean and I need to use them
for another at least year if not 2 and there is no way I am going to buy
new ones. And, I'm not going to use dirty-looking diapers.
Like all parents, I read to my kids. And one of the stories I read is Mickey's Christmas Carol.
Now in this story, there's a part where we see Mr. Scrooge's laundry
over the fire and it occurred to me that in the way back days people did
have white clothing. (I've always assumed that brides wore white
through history not only as a show of purity but because it would have
been nearly impossible to have white clothing. So it would have been a
show of $$$ to have a nice white dress.)
With this spark of inspiration, I took out the diapers that didn't get
clean after round 1 in the wash machine and put them in a pot with
boiling water and some Oxy Clean. Put the pot on the stove top on high
for an hour or so - and AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH, clean diapers.
Who'da thunk? Looking back helped me with my 'old school' diapering problem. Perhaps it'll help you too!
Brought to you by You Get Well Soon Inc.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on July 28, 2010 at 12:04 PM under
0 comments
I know that I'm not a girly-girl.
Never have been. I do have some experience with being in the hospital
and I also know that when you're all alone for 20+ hours a day a nice
floral arrangement does make you feel better. (It doesn't do anything
for me when I'm at home but hey that's me.)
The thing is
there will come a time (and it's here in some places) when flowers
won't be allowed in rooms at all. There are already bans in France and
the UK and probably more of Europe. The reasoning that's been used has
little to do with the real hazards though. So what reasons did they use
to create / enforce the ban? Bacteria in the water of flowers, oxygen
use (by the flowers and therefore less available oxygen for a
compromised patient) and a potential hazard to equipment should they
tip. Well these are somewhat valid reasons I suppose. When a patient
has very serious and urgent oxygen needs every little bit makes a
difference but this won't apply to the vast majority of patients.

Bacteria in the flower water sounds like
a possible health risk but it's again unlikely to cause problems. You'd
have to drink the bacteria or inhale them. No one's drinking flower
water. As for inhaling the bacteria, this sounds easier than it is. The
water would have to beaerosolized for that to occur. So it'd have to be put into a spray bottle (and when are those going to be banned in restaurants, etc. Spray bottles cause aerosolization of whatever surface greeblies
that are supposed to be cleaned off.) It's unlikely that flower water
would end up in a spray bottle. Again, for the very few who would be
affected by such a minor number of bacteria of that variety, it would
be a health risk but not for every patient.
Equipment
risks - that's the third listed issue for no flowers. This is a real
possibility given that there is very little space in hospital rooms and
always too much stuff. So tipping them over and perhaps having water
get on machinery - that could certainly happen. And here, the hospital
wouldn't charge us for such an accident so the hospital would have to
absorb the replacement costs.
Why didn't they use the real
reasons: spores, pollen, water molds, multiple chemical sensitivities,
nurses have enough to do and look after? Now there's a question. As the
sound bites about severe peanut allergies
should have enlightened all and sundry, fungal spores are very
dangerous. Fatally dangerous to some. This was enough to handcuff
parents to never include any peanut-containing items in kids lunches
for school. (What lesseconomically advantaged parents do when peanut
butter is one of the best combinations of cost, nutrition and
kid-appeal; I don't know?) There are fungal spores associated with soil
and therefore flowers. And again, we know from the peanut allergypeople
who you don't have to have an appreciable number for 1 to get through
and cause trouble.
Pollen. There are tons of people
allergic to pollen. Let's face it, if someone's living in a hospital
(even short-term) there's something seriously wrong with them. They
don't need additional problems. They've got problems already. I
encountered this one when I was in hospital. I was there so long that I
ended up with more roommates that I could have ever imagined - I think
it was 9 in the 17 days I was there. And one of them was allergic to
pollen. So I was given a choice, I could ditch the flowers or I could
move. I chose to move. It worked out even better for me because I
finally ended up with a window. I digress.
Water molds. I know
this is a bit of an odd one and it takes time for them to form but the
spores from water molds are very dangerous for those who are allergic /
sensitive. My sister has this one (and the next one - multiple chemical
sensitivity). You'll know if you have this one if you live where
there's snow. Snow has more time to develop molds and so with snow melt
- the mold spores are released and physiological reactions ensue.
Multiple
Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a very real problem for an increasing
number of people. This one isn't an allergy but it is a neurological
response to chemicals sometimes including those of flowers. Usually
it's triggered by chemicals from personal hygiene items (soap, perfume,
hairspray, shampoo, hand cream, laundry detergent, etc.) It's a very
difficult issue to manage when in public - and there's pretty much
nothing more public than living in a place that gets 10's of 'visitors'
every day; from the teams of doctors, nurses, cleaning staff, your
personal visitors, everyone else's visitors, deliverypersonnel, and the
list goes on.
Nurses
have enough to do. This one is self-explanatory. They do an impossible
job and somehow manage to be nice (most of the time) while doing it.
They really don't need to watch out for everything that comes into the
room that isn't 'hospital equipment'.
I'll just add one more thing. When I was putting together the inventory for my business (YouGetWellSoon),
we needed bags. So we went to our local people for some compostable
bags and got into a discussion with the girl at the counter. Turned out
she was the daughter of the owners and had been in hospital for a
kidney problem. She had received flowers but since she was in the ICU
was not able to have them with her. If she craned her head, she could
see them sitting on the nursing station table. Not quite what her
benefactor had in mind. 
Bottom
line - this once stable of the hospital gift may soon be no more. So
before your gift gets turned back, perhaps check with the facility or
give a gift that is more in keeping with what a patient may want / need. It may be less fun but it'll get through the door.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on July 6, 2010 at 8:54 PM under
0 comments
Alrighty, for those who've not read my profile, I used to work on a
hospital campus for much of the last decade. During one of those jobs
(and I don't remember which), I went over to the cafeteria to get a
snack. I do not have much of a sweet tooth but every once in a while I
too am seduced by a fine-looking treat. The treat in question - Nanaimo
square. Here's
a pretty good rendition of the dessert treat. It's got a base of
cocoa-laden coconut goodness, a middle of an icing-like substance and a
solid chocolate topper. (How to tell that I don't bake much?)
Anywhoosie, I was a bit tired and not paying terribly much attention so
I picked one up and went the register. Now this is a hospital
cafeteria. It has no labels on anything. I mean that literally - the
only labels are on the big board for hot foods. None of the desserts
are labeled in any way. So I was paying and even unwrapping the thing
before I even left. (It's got a very large seating area.)I did
notice as I picked up the square that it had a darker than expected
middle section. My sister bakes and this was one of the first things
she ever made - it was fab, so she made it often in those early years
before she realized she was gluten-intolerant. So I know this middle
section should look anything from creamy vanilla through yellow. This
one from the hospital was slightly brownish. With one bite I was to
find out why - the centre was peanut flavoured.
SAY WHAT?!?
In
a hospital, they failed to label a peanut-containing item. I
immediately spit out the bite and proceeded to ask the cashier about
the peanuts. She looked at me as if to accuse me of a crime and said
that if I was allergic - it was my responsibility to inform the staff
and ask prior to ordering / purchasing any food. Really? I don't think
so. A hospital should always take responsibility for the people they
SERVE. Are they trying to create 'customers'? Now
I am in the fortunate position to be actually allergic to peanuts. For
those with allergies, they'll understand immediately. People with
serious peanut allergies are not allergic to peanuts themselves but a
fungus found on the shells and associated with peanuts. That's why it's
so dangerous. If it were an allergy to the peanut, it would have to be
present. As opposed to products that have merely been processed in a
factory that has had peanuts in it. Spores from the fungus are very
small and airborne. It's impossible to eliminate every spore and so
that's why it's dangerous to have this allergy.
The crazy thing to me is the hospital cafeteria isn't the only
place (even though they certainly know better) that I've encountered
this. I was very kindly invited as a guest of my boyfriend to the home
of his friend's mom. She had made an enormous Indian feast. There was
to be butter chicken, tandori chicken, some lamb, desserts and
everything. As an appetizer (as if this feast wasn't enough) she had
prepared fish cakes. I was perched on her couch in the living room and
as an impeccable hostess, she handed me one of the fresh fish cakes hot
off the pan. I gladly tried what was for me a new version of a fish
cake. I was munching away and notice something crunchy. I mention aloud,
'hmm, crunchy. What's that, chick peas?' She peaked out from the
kitchen - 'Peanuts'. I spit out the food and start trying to find any
actual peanut pieces in my mouth to get rid of them.
It's not like peanut allergies are uncommon. And like most
everything in the media, we hear of the extreme cases. Just a few
months prior to this incident, a medical student had died due to a
restaurant not disclosing their use of peanuts in the kitchen. For
whatever reason, serious, fatal anaphylaxis is not unusual in those
with peanut allergies. In the realm of fatal allergies there are a few
big nasties, antibiotics, aspirin, bee/wasp bites and peanuts. And of
them all, peanuts are the worst due to the whole spore thing.
(Antibiotics can be made this way but it's far more rare these days.
Not to mention the likelihood of encountering someone popping
antibiotics while out-and-about are far lower than being on a bus with
someone opening a chocolate bar that was made in a factory that uses
peanuts.)Maybe more businesses need to be guilted into being
careful. Whatever the answer, be careful. Clearly we take nothing for
granted.I am allergic to a protein that makes up
the peanut. So if the peanuts are processed enough, the proteins are
broken down and it's not harmful for ME (and I'm only referring to my
personal case) to eat it. This is an important distinction. I don't
want anyone thinking that it's OK for them to mash and heat the
begeebers out of a peanut and eat it as some sort of test. Don't! My
case is quite unique - don't endanger yourself or someone you love.
-
Posted by Dione Kolodka on March 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM under
0 comments
Gelatin and Carrageenan – Thick as Thieves
You find gelatin in food products that have been thickened. Food
consistency (loose or thick) is a matter taste. Mouthfeel is what the
term is for how a product feels in the mouth and some of us are very
sensitive to this. That is why we choose one brand of sour cream, for
example, over another.
Gelatin is the most common ingredient used to achieve a thicker
product. Gelatin is animal-based, usually extracted from the boiled
bone remains of animals used in food processing (cows, pigs, sheep
and chickens).
Although someone allergic to cow, pig, sheep or chicken products
may know they should probably avoid foods containing gelatin, they
may not be aware of the animal connection at their doctor’s office.
Most vaccines (be they for big stuff like Hepatitis or for more
common but equally scary health conditions like the flu / influenza)
are often produced using actual animal products – like foetal /
fetal calf serum – and/or grown in animals (like horses) and then
extracted and purified before being given to human recipients. IF you
have serious allergies to animals, make your doctor or hospital staff
aware of this before you receive a shot.
Non-animal-based thickeners are becoming more commercially
available. Most are extracted from sea plants. Agar and carrageenan
are the better known examples. They have also been used for
generations in the food industry and because they are plant-based,
they are considered suitable for vegetarian diets.
If you have digestive problems (like Coeliac / Celiac or Crohn’s
Disease) and or are immuno-compromised you may want to consider
avoiding carrageenan-containng products. There have been recent
studies that suggest carrageenan irritates intestinal linings and can
therefore further negatively influence adsorption of nutrients into
the system.
For follow-up information we suggest contacting your local
healthcare website, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website or
Wikipedia.
|
 Shopping Basket
Note: All prices in Canadian Dollars
 Specials
Office Gift PackThis handy little gift pack is perfect for the colleague who's down and out.
Office get well soon gift bag contains a mug, snacks, cream and tissues. You never know when you need to give a gift to a colleague and this one is handy and suits men and women.
Perfect hospital gift for a man.
|
|